 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| State v. Steelmon, NO. COA05-847,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, April 4, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not abuse its discretion in allowing officer to testify as expert under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 8C-1, N.C. R. Evid. 702(a) regarding approximate time of death. State offered ample evidence, including officer's education, experience, and specialized training, that officer was better qualified to give opinion on subject than trier of fact.
|
|||||
| State v. Woodard, NO. COA05-597,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, April 4, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Woodberry, NO. COA05-459,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, April 4, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Susi v. Aubin, NO. COA05-1300,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, April 4, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Widenhouse v. Crumpler, NO. COA05-805,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, April 4, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Wood v. Owen, NO. COA05-742,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, April 4, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Wright v. Town of Matthews, NO. COA05-239,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, April 4, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The finding that the street was a public street under Matthews, N.C., Code § 1-6 was in error. There was no evidence of an express dedication of the street. Because the deed's provision relating to a right-of-way did not specify whether the right-of-way was for a public or private street, the provision did not create a public right-of-way.
|
|||||
| Young v. Jordan, NO. COA05-695,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, April 4, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
