 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Banks v. Dunn, NO. COA05-738,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, April 18, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Bio-Medical Applications of N.C., Inc. v. N.C. HHS, NO. COA05-820,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, April 18, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Canty v. Hayes Mem. United Holy Church, Inc., NO. COA05-1054,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, April 18, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Carson v. Carson, NO. COA05-857,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, April 18, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where the parties could not agree to the wife's proposed amendment of the record on appeal, the two documents at issue, pursuant to N.C. R. App. P. 11(c), should have been filed with the record on appeal as exhibits. The husband erred in filing those documents with the record rather than as exhibits.
|
|||||
| Devone v. Devone, NO. COA05-967,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, April 18, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Glover Constr. Co. v. N.C. DOT, NO. COA05-525,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, April 18, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Head v. State, NO. COA05-1015,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, April 18, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because the dismissal of the state, a county, and a town did not dispose of a plaintiff's cause as to all parties, because the judgments were not certified for immediate appeal, and because no substantial right was involved, pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1A-1, N.C. R. Civ. P. 54(a), the appeal was dismissed as interlocutory.
|
|||||
| In re A.D.P., NO. COA05-786,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, April 18, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re B.C., NO. COA05-856,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, April 18, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
