 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Babb v. Bynum & Murphrey, PLLC, NO. COA06-876,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, April 17, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Lawyer owed no duty to trustee and beneficiary for his partner's misconduct relating to estate and trust, and summary judgment for lawyer in claim by trustee and beneficiary was proper because Limited Liability Company Act, N.C. Gen. Stat. § 57C-3-30(a), did not require lawyer to investigate his partner absent actual knowledge of misconduct.
|
|||||
| Bee v. Purser Constr. Serv., NO. COA06-900,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, April 17, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Belanger v. Warren, NO. COA06-562,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, April 17, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Berryhill v. Shelton, NO. COA06-697,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, April 17, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Blevins v. Town of W. Jefferson, NO. COA06-930,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, April 17, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where record on appeal did not show town and town adjustment board's notice of appeal was filed with trial court's county clerk, did not contain a stamped or filed copy of a notice of appeal, and failed to include proof of service on recycling company, the record did not comply with relevant appellate rules and their appeal had to be dismissed.
|
|||||
| Blohm v. Clark, NO. COA06-899,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, April 17, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Blow v. DSM Pharms., Inc., NO. COA06-812,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, April 17, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Boger v. Humphries, NO. COA06-809,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, April 17, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Bolick v. Brizendine (In re D.R.B.), NO. COA06-1540,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, April 17, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Order terminating father's parental rights was improper because it did not identify any N.C. Gen. Stat. § 7B-1111(a) grounds for termination and did not indicate evidentiary standard used. Without an identified basis for adjudication, effective review was precluded. Father's incarceration alone was insufficient to support the termination order.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
