 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| In re Estate of Mullins, NO. COA06-468,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, April 17, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Order affirming clerk's decision to set aside prior reopening of decedent's estate was proper because, inter alia, although shareholders filed a claim against estate after the reopening, they did not file a claim before the estate was closed, and thus, the claim was forever barred against the estate pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 28A-19-3.
|
|||||
| In re H.S.F., NO. COA06-1608,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, April 17, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court's order was affirmed as conclusion of law that it was in child's best interest to grant legal custody to child's father was proper because father's fitness and ability to provide proper care to and supervision of child was not contested. In contrast, mother's unfitness and inability to provide proper care for child was uncontested.
|
|||||
| In re J.E., NO. COA06-1553,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, April 17, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court's actions in finding that children were neglected and dependent and placing them in the guardianship of their maternal grandparents did not constitute placement mandating compliance with the Interstate Compact on the Placement of Children, N.C. Gen. Stat. § 7B-3800 because it was not in foster care or as a preliminary to adoption.
|
|||||
| In re Key, NO. COA06-498,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, April 17, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial judge did not abuse his discretion by suspending for one year the right of an attorney to practice in the trial courts of Wake County, North Carolina because substantial evidence showed that the attorney's conduct by not representing a client after making a general appearance on the client's behalf violated N.C. Rev. R. Prof. Conduct 1.16.
|
|||||
| In re P.A.B., NO. COA06-669,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, April 17, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re P.L., NO. COA06-810,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, April 17, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re S.M.S., NO. COA06-229,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, April 17, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re S.P., NO. COA 06-1082,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, April 17, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re T.A.B., NO. COA06-960,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, April 17, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
