 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| State v. Pemberton, NO. COA05-1083,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, April 18, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Pruett, NO. COA05-1077,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, April 18, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Reese, NO. COA05-558,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, April 18, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Riddick, NO. COA05-652,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, April 18, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Robinson, NO. COA05-499,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, April 18, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: N.C. Gen. Stat. § 90-95(h)(5) allowed trial court to depart from a statutorily mandated sentence if defendant, who pleaded guilty to trafficking in cocaine, rendered substantial assistance to law enforcement. In deciding not to reduce defendant's sentence, trial court did not err in finding that defendant failed to render substantial assistance.
|
|||||
| State v. Scott, NO. COA05-1144,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, April 18, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Starkey, NO. COA05-1013,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, April 18, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: When a trial court, sua sponte, vacated defendant's habitual felon conviction and reduced a sentence, the State could not appeal, under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-1422 (2005), as the underlying judgment did not dismiss a charge or impose unauthorized prison. A writ of certiorari's requirements were not met, nor was it proper to suspend appellate rules.
|
|||||
| State v. Teague, NO. COA05-1172,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, April 18, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Verbal, NO. COA05-1000,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, April 18, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
