 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| In re N.B., NO. COA 06-814,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, May 1, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Termination of a father's parental rights was affirmed because the trial court's findings regarding the father were properly supported by clear, cogent, and convincing evidence, and its findings supported its conclusions. Additionally, there was no merit in any of the assignments of error noted in the record.
|
|||||
| In re N.D.H., NO. COA06-1686,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, May 1, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re Q.P.W., NO. COA06-1120,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, May 1, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re S.L.H., NO. COA06-1049,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, May 1, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re S.S., NO. COA06-1668,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, May 1, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re S.T.O., NO. COA06-1145,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, May 1, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re W.B.M., NO. COA06-1614,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, May 1, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Joker Club, L.L.C. v. Hardin, NO. COA06-123,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, May 1, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Poker club owner was denied a declaratory judgment and a temporary restraining order regarding the operation of a poker club because chance predominated over skill in the game of poker, thus making poker a game of chance under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-292. Accordingly, the owner's proposed operation of the club was illegal under § 14-292.
|
|||||
| Jones v. City of Durham, NO. COA04-662-2,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, May 1, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Denial of city's summary judgment motion on pedestrian's claim that city violated N.C. Const. art. 1, § 19 by asserting the defense of governmental immunity to her claims was error because the uncontradicted evidence established that claims against city were never denied on basis of sovereign immunity, but paid or denied on basis of merits.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
