 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Lunsford v. Republic Servs. of N.C., LLC, NO. COA06-1163,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, May 1, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Magana v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Bd. of Educ., NO. COA06-1193,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, May 1, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Board did not waive immunity under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 115C-42 by purchasing policy providing coverage in excess of board's self-insured retention of $ 1,000,000 because board had immunity from tort claims, so it could not have been required to pay any of the $ 1,000,000 self-insured amount and, thus, excess policy provided no indemnification.
|
|||||
| Martin County v. Ange, NO. COA06-806,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, May 1, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| McNeil v. Hill, NO. COA06-827,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, May 1, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Newcomb v. County of Carteret, NO. COA06-1202,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, May 1, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Denial of non-owners' motion to dismiss declaratory judgment action was interlocutory and not subject to appeal because non-owners' claim that, after trial court determined parties' rights, a tribunal in a hypothetical future proceeding might have ruled differently did not create possibility of inconsistent verdicts on same factual issue.
|
|||||
| Rocco v. Rocco, NO. COA06-555,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, May 1, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Royal v. Pate, NO. COA06-571,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, May 1, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Sanders v. State Pers. Comm'n, NO. COA06-149,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, May 1, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred by dismissing temporary employees' claims for violations of N.C. Const. art. I, §§ 1, 19, and 35 and for breach of contract because the doctrine of sovereign immunity did not bar the claims against the state agencies. However, the employees' claim for a violation of 25 N.C. Admin. Code 1C.0405 was barred by sovereign immunity.
|
|||||
| Schneider Nat'l Carriers, Inc. v. Streuli Sales, Inc., NO. COA06-959,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, May 1, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
