 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| State v. Cummings, NO. COA05-1063,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, May 2, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Garibay, NO. COA05-444,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, May 2, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Glenn, NO. COA05-1014,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, May 2, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Hall, NO. COA05-654,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, May 2, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Herndon, NO. COA05-724,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, May 2, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In trial for first-degree murder, instruction on voluntary manslaughter was proper where defendant's own evidence showed elements of imperfect self defense and there was substantial evidence presented from which jury could have found defendant employed excessive force in shooting victim five times in back or buttocks while acting in self-defense.
|
|||||
| State v. Hocutt, NO. COA05-473,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, May 2, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Recorded conversations were not obtained in violation of defendant's constitutional rights; defendant was permissibly in jail, and there was no Sixth Amendment violation where defendant was not afforded "guiding hand of counsel" prior to phone call. As initial seizure was not unconstitutional, trial court did not err in denying motion to suppress.
|
|||||
| State v. Nix, NO. COA05-1122,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, May 2, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Rayfield, NO. COA05-862,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, May 2, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Ridley, NO. COA03-1543,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, May 2, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| Copyright© 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
