 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Burgess v. Am. Express Co., 07 CVS 40,
NORTH CAROLINA SUPERIOR COURT, POLK COUNTY, May 21, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Corporation's motion for prosecution bond under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1-109 was denied as allegations that corporation used program inserted by third parties to place unauthorized "pop-up" advertisements on owner's personal computer were not patently frivolous, even if they ultimately proved to be without merit.
|
|||||
| Burgess v. Am. Express Co., 07 CVS 40,
NORTH CAROLINA SUPERIOR COURT, POLK COUNTY, May 21, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A corporation's motion under N.C. R. Civ. P. 12(e) for a more definite statement in a computer owner's action alleging that corporations placed or used illegal pop-up advertisements on his computer was denied because the owner stated a claim for trespass to chattel and the details of the claim could be learned through discovery.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
