 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| James v. Lemmons , NO. COA05-1219,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, May 16, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Former employee was not disqualified for unemployment insurance benefits because her absenteeism was not misconduct under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 96-14(2) as her absences were for good cause and she gave her employer appropriate notice regarding her absences. Further, her behavior was not substantial fault under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 96-14(2a).
|
|||||
| Lincoln County Bd. of Educ. v. SAN-GRA Corp., NO. COA05-963,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, May 16, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Lincoln v. Bueche, NO. COA05-970,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, May 16, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Palmer v. Jackson, NO. COA05-1067,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, May 16, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Scott v. Scott, NO. COA05-803,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, May 16, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Shavitz v. City of High Point, NO. COA05-571,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, May 16, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Superior court properly found that a county board of education was entitled to funds derived from a city's red light camera program, which was implemented under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 160A-300.1(c), as N.C. Const. art. IX, § 7 applied to the civil penalties assessed by the city and the funds were properly allocated under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 115C-437.
|
|||||
| Snow v. County of Dare, NO. COA05-1104,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, May 16, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Battle, NO. COA05-1211,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, May 16, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Brigman, NO. COA05-712,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, May 16, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Out-of-court statements to foster parents and pediatrician were admissible under residual exception to hearsay rule as they were not testimonial and were evidence of material facts. On motion for appropriate relief hearing was necessary to determine if there was possibility of different result had certain testimony been different or nonexistent.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
