LexisNexis
  

Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - North Carolina - June 6, 2006

  
In re C.N.R., NO. COA05-1159, COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, June 6, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
In re C.S., NO. COA05-1362, COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, June 6, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
In re D.H. , NO. COA05-1501, COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, June 6, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Trial court terminated a mother's parental rights based on, inter alia, neglect and abandonment. The trial court was not required to appoint a guardian ad litem to the mother under either N.C. Gen. Stat. § 7B-1101 or N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1A-1, N.C. R. Civ. P. 17 since the mother's rights were not terminated based on the mother's mental health issues.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
In re E.M., NO. COA05-1019, COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, June 6, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
In re G.G.A.R., NO. COA05-1084, COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, June 6, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
In re J.H., NO. COA05-981, COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, June 6, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Substantial evidence showed that juvenile had possession of his mother's stolen car, as he was found with it days later. His delinquency adjudication for felonious possession had to be reversed; no evidence of car's condition or value was shown, and State did not satisfy N.C. Gen. Stat. §§ 14-71.1, requiring item to have value of more than $1,000.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
In re J.J.A.L., No. COA05-744, No. COA05-745, No. COA05-746, COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, June 6, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
In re K.B. , NO. COA05-1162, COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, June 6, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
In re Lustgarten, NO. COA05-891, COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, June 6, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Trial court erred in affirming the North Carolina Medical Board's suspension of doctor under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 90-14(a)(6) (2005) as doctor did not testify that another doctor had tried to temporize findings and write note that was benevolent until pressed to do so and testimony was based on substantial evidence.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
In re M.G.T.-B., NO. COA05-1396, COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, June 6, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Even if hearsay statements by a child were improperly admitted, the error was harmless because the other evidence alone warranted a finding of dependency and neglect. The evidence included the mother's violation of a safety plan, a scar, extensive tooth decay, verbal abuse, and expert testimony about the child's psychological symptoms.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

  www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us
  CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.