 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| State v. Hardin, NO. COA05-1017,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, June 6, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Hatchett, No. COA05-680,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, June 6, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Lipscomb, NO. COA05-1280,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, June 6, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Lopez, NO. COA05-983,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, June 6, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Love, NO. COA05-1237,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, June 6, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Among other things, defendants were not denied fair trial by joinder notwithstanding conflicts in testimony, as State offered plenary evidence of three defendants' guilt. Although the trial court violated the mandatory statutory procedure for jury selection in N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15a-1214, defendants failed to show any prejudice resulting therefrom.
|
|||||
| State v. Maxwell, NO. COA05-1220,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, June 6, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. McCollum, NO. COA05-845,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, June 6, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not err in failing to intervene ex mero motu during State's closing as 1) context for prosecutor's comments was to explain that defendant's lack of specific motive could not absolve him of responsibility for first-degree murder; and 2) reference to World Trade Center attack was not attempt to equate his acts to those of terrorists.
|
|||||
| State v. McGill, NO. COA05-1071,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, June 6, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Monroy, NO. COA05-991,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, June 6, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
