 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| State v. Nipper, NO. COA05-909,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, June 6, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant, who allegedly set fire to a garage about 30 feet from an inhabited house, was properly charged with first-degree arson under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-58 and not with burning an outbuilding under N.C. Gen. Stat. 14-62, although tension existed between the two statutes, because arson included buildings within the curtilage of dwelling houses.
|
|||||
| State v. Otis, NO. COA05-1170,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, June 6, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Pean, NO. COA05-1293,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, June 6, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Ritter, NO. COA05-888,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, June 6, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Roberts, NO. COA05-1032,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, June 6, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Spencer, NO. COA05-623,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, June 6, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Stringfield, NO. COA05-601,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, June 6, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Summers, NO. COA05-1248,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, June 6, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Contention trial court erred in denying motion for a mistrial based on improper identification was not properly preserved for review because defense counsel failed to raise an objection when the victim testified about the photo line-up. Testimony of a state witness was properly admitted as it was relevant to show plan, modus operandi, and identity.
|
|||||
| State v. Talley, NO. COA05-1358,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, June 6, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| Copyright© 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
