 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| State v. Ward, NO. COA05-1282,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, June 6, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Williams, NO. COA05-978,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, June 6, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's conviction for trafficking in cocaine by transportation under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 90-95(h)(3)(c) (2005) was reversed as there was no evidence that defendant moved cocaine from one place to another. When law enforcement arrived, defendant's vehicle containing cocaine was already parked and it remained stationary during operation.
|
|||||
| State v. Wilson, NO. COA05-511,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, June 6, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Windless, NO. COA05-1225,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, June 6, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Steffes v. DeLapp, NO. COA05-864,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, June 6, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a dispute involving the dissolution of a corporation, remand was required to determine whether the trial court had properly denied defendants' motion to stay and compel arbitration. Because the trial court had not stated the grounds for its decision, meaningful review of the decision was impossible.
|
|||||
| Thortex, Inc. v. Std. Dyes, Inc., NO. COA05-1274,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, June 6, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Tillman v. Commer. Credit Loans, Inc., NO. COA05-924,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, June 6, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Arbitration clause was not unconscionable; borrowers did not prove that costs exceeded those of litigation, waiver excluding class actions and foreclosures was valid, sufficient consideration existed as mutuality did not mean equal application of terms to both parties, and equal comparisons of costs between arbitration and litigation was not made.
|
|||||
| White v. Cross Sales & Eng'g Co., NO. COA05-1075,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, June 6, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Lack of demand for firing and lack of inducement provided, the business motives of former employer, and the prior dealings between former employer and another company, showed that former employer did not intentionally induce the company to fire a former employee. Thus, former employee could not prove her tortious interference with a contract claim.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
