 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Ball v. Maynard, NO. COA06-1545,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, June 19, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment was affirmed as seller waived original closing date by agreeing to provide buyers with valid septic improvements permit, and parties had reasonable time to close. Even if ruling that buyers' time to close had not run when seller attempted to terminate contract was misapprehension of law on modification, it did not affect result.
|
|||||
| Batts v. Clayton, NO. COA06-1182,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, June 19, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Bazzarre v. Harnett County Bd. of Adjustment, NO. COA06-1013,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, June 19, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Beaufort County Bd. of Educ. v. Beaufort County Bd. of Comm'rs, NO. COA06-1419,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, June 19, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A trial court's gag order was unconstitutional under the First Amendment and failed to meet the standards of N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1-72.1 when the trial court failed to enter written findings of a clear threat to the fairness of the trial between a school board and county board of commissioners or to consider less restrictive alternatives.
|
|||||
| Beddard v. Albritton, NO. COA06-1241,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, June 19, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Bissette v. Kernodle, NO. COA06-1170,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, June 19, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Borgersrode v. Borgersrode, NO. COA06-1362,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, June 19, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Cannon & Co., LLP v. Estate of Alexander, NO. COA06-1019,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, June 19, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Capps v. Virrey, NO. COA06-655,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, June 19, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Denial of a motorist's motion to compel arbitration of his UM/UIM claim was proper because the motorist's discovery requests in a civil action against, among others, the carrier, exceeded the scope allowed by the Uniform Arbitration Act, and the motorist thereby waived his right to compel arbitration.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
