 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Hammonds v. Lumbee River Elec. Mbrshp. Corp., NO. COA05-733,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, June 20, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Superior court judgment dismissing rural electric cooperative members' claims of racial discrimination against a rural electric cooperative and its officials was affirmed as the members failed to present sufficient evidence of a violation of any diversity rule contained in N.C. Gen. Stat. §§ 117-13 and 117-16, or a violation of 42 U.S.C.S. § 2000d.
|
|||||
| Hodge v. Harkey, NO. COA05-1416,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, June 20, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment for neighbor's tenant and petroleum servicing company was proper as company removed underground storage tanks and tenant's lease ended in 1988; claims were barred under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1-52(16) (2006) as last act or omission that could give rise to claim occurred in 1988, which was more than 10 years before suit was filed.
|
|||||
| In re A.R.G., NO. COA05-1268,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, June 20, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Father's appeal of a trial court's order that a county agency pursue the adoption of the father's child and terminate the father's parental rights was dismissed because the order on appeal was not a final order for purposes of appeal as none of the provisions of N.C. Gen. Stat. § 7B-1001 applied.
|
|||||
| In re J.W.B., NO. COA05-1504,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, June 20, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re L.B., NO. COA05-1565,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, June 20, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re T.L., NO. COA06-17,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, June 20, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re T.S., NO. COA 05-765,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, June 20, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court's order concluding that a mother's children were neglected and ordering the continued legal custody of the children with a state agency was affirmed because the trial court's findings supported its conclusion of law that the children were neglected juveniles under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 7B-101(15).
|
|||||
| Ocean Hill Joint Venture v. Currituck County Bd. of Comm'rs, NO. COA05-1405,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, June 20, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Pursuant to a hearing statutorily mandated by N.C. Gen. Stat. § 153A-241, burden of proof remained on a property owners association to show that a county board correctly found that closing roads in a subdivision was not contrary to the public interest, because it shouldered the initial burden when the board first convened to determine the issue.
|
|||||
| Phillips v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hosp. Auth., NO. COA05-300,
COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA, June 20, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
