 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Miller v. Workforce Safety & Ins., No. 20040064,
SUPREME COURT OF NORTH DAKOTA, January 5, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where letter from Workforce Safety and Insurance's outside counsel was mistakenly addressed to WSI inside counsel and then given to WSI claims director, the intended recipient, without notice and an opportunity for claimant to respond, an improper communication violating N.D. Cent. Code § 28-32-37 occurred when letter was redirected to director.
|
|||||
| Disciplinary Bd. v. McKechnie (In re McKechnie), No. 20050362 & 20050363,
SUPREME COURT OF NORTH DAKOTA, January 9, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A lawyer was suspended from the practice of law for 2 years, with 18 months to run concurrently with the previous suspension for unethical conduct in violating N.D. R. Prof. Conduct 1.3, 1.1, 1.5(a), 1.15(b) and (f), and 1.16(e) in two client matters, and other disciplinary conditions were imposed.
|
|||||
| Discip. Bd. of the Supreme Court v. Buresh (In re Buresh), No. 20060023,
SUPREME COURT OF NORTH DAKOTA, January 25, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Pursuant to N.D. R. Law. Disc. 3.4(B), court granted application for interim suspension of lawyer filed by Disciplinary Board of Supreme Court of State of North Dakota where a check for $ 30,956, drawn on lawyer's trust account, was returned for non-sufficient funds; evidence implied violation of N.D. R. Prof. Conduct 1.15(a), safekeeping property.
|
|||||
| In re Judicial Vacancy in District Judgeship No. 1, No. 20060004,
SUPREME COURT OF NORTH DAKOTA, January 27, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court determined that the office of the retiring Judge of the District Court, with chambers in Bismarck, South Central Judicial District, North Dakota, was necessary for effective judicial administration as required by N.D. Cent. Code § 27-05-02.1 and ordered that the office be filled in its present location.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
