 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Wagner v. Wagner, No. 20060124,
SUPREME COURT OF NORTH DAKOTA, March 2, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A district court properly awarded a wife rehabilitative spousal support instead of permanent support where she was 49 years old, educated, had received income generating property from the marital estate, and had the ability and desire to start a career and increase her income after further education and training.
|
|||||
| Carlson v. Carlson (In re Estate of Carlson), No. 20060204,
SUPREME COURT OF NORTH DAKOTA, March 5, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: North Dakota court lacked jurisdiction to deny a motion to substitute a personal representative as the party in a pending California action relating to the division of retirement benefits after the death of a former husband because a former wife was required to apply to the California court under Cal. Prob. Code § 9370.
|
|||||
| Riverwood Commer. Park, LLC v. Std. Oil Co., No. 20060122,
SUPREME COURT OF NORTH DAKOTA, March 5, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiffs' claims were not barred by res judicata because N.D. Cent. Code § 33-06-04 expressly prohibited plaintiffs from pleading claims for slander of title, right to quiet title, interference with prospective advantage, fraud, and nuisance in their prior summary eviction action; therefore, the trial court erred by dismissing the complaint.
|
|||||
| Turner v. R.W.S. (In the Interest of R.W.S.), No. 20060167,
SUPREME COURT OF NORTH DAKOTA, March 5, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Even though the juvenile court violated the child's due process rights by refusing to remove his handcuffs at the delinquency hearing without independently deciding the necessity of restraints, the error was harmless given the overwhelming evidence against the child showing that he had committed burglary, robbery, and disorderly conduct.
|
|||||
| State v. Altru Health Sys., No. 20060107,
SUPREME COURT OF NORTH DAKOTA, March 8, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: There was no abuse of discretion under N.D. Cent. Code § 65-02-11, in prohibiting the claimant's treating physician and physician's assistant to review videotaped surveillance of the claimant, because compelling them to observe the videotape and make new observations went beyond the scope of the claimant's consent in N.D. Cent. Code § 65-05-30.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
