 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Hieb v. Hieb, No. 20060240,
SUPREME COURT OF NORTH DAKOTA, May 1, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Holbach v. Dixon, No. 20060275,
SUPREME COURT OF NORTH DAKOTA, May 1, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a case in which appellant had petitioned for a temporary disorderly conduct restraining order against appellee, although district court, in dismissing the order, erred in allowing appellee to appear by interactive video network (IVN), the error was harmless, where appellee's appearance by IVN could not have changed the result of the proceeding.
|
|||||
| Kessel v. Rutherford, No. 20060267,
SUPREME COURT OF NORTH DAKOTA, May 1, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Knoll v. D.M. (In the Interest of D.M.), No. 20060236,
SUPREME COURT OF NORTH DAKOTA, May 1, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Termination of a mother's parental rights was proper under N.D. Cent. Code § 27-20-44 because the child was deprived since she was in foster care due to a lack of proper parental care, the deprivation was likely to continue based on the mother's drug and alcohol abuse, and the child had suffered harm due to the mother's failure to visit.
|
|||||
| Kostelecky v. Kostelecky, No. 20060352,
SUPREME COURT OF NORTH DAKOTA, May 1, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| North Dakota v. Georgeson, No. 20060211,
SUPREME COURT OF NORTH DAKOTA, May 1, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Olsson v. Workforce Safety & Ins., No. 20060371,
SUPREME COURT OF NORTH DAKOTA, May 1, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Stadheim v. Stadheim, No. 20060193,
SUPREME COURT OF NORTH DAKOTA, May 1, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Helton, No. 20060311,
SUPREME COURT OF NORTH DAKOTA, May 1, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Evidence was sufficient to convict defendant for delivering alcohol to minors, even though he did not actually physically transfer alcohol to them. Minors testified that they believed defendant was holding alcohol for them and that they knew where he stored his possessions. Minors also had the means of gaining access to defendant's possessions.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
