 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| City of Minot v. Hellebust, No. 20050372,
SUPREME COURT OF NORTH DAKOTA, May 11, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Clifford v. Redmann, No. 20050419,
SUPREME COURT OF NORTH DAKOTA, May 11, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Discip. Bd. v. Hellerud (In re Hellerud), No. 20050354,
SUPREME COURT OF NORTH DAKOTA, May 11, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Attorney was required to refund client fees for violating N.D. R. Prof. Conduct 1.5(a) & (b) as there were excessive hours billed, combined with a higher than average hourly rate; reprimand was appropriate under N.D. Stand. Imposing Law. Sanctions 4.13 and 7.3. Assessment of costs was appropriate under N.D. R. Law. Disc. 1.3(D).
|
|||||
| Feland v. J.M. (In the Interest of J.M.), No. 20050383,
SUPREME COURT OF NORTH DAKOTA, May 11, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Commitment as a sexually dangerous person was affirmed because the commitment was supported by clear and convincing evidence, and the claimant could not show he was prejudiced by the delay in holding the commitment hearing.
|
|||||
| Kaiser v. State, No. 20050319,
SUPREME COURT OF NORTH DAKOTA, May 11, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Knutson v. City of Fargo, No. 20050355,
SUPREME COURT OF NORTH DAKOTA, May 11, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment in favor of a city after a city water main broke and flooded private property was affirmed because the property owners failed as a matter of law to establish inverse condemnation, trespass, or negligence; in part, the city had not committed any deliberate act to damage the property, and it had authority to install the water main.
|
|||||
| Lausen v. Hertz, No. 20050371,
SUPREME COURT OF NORTH DAKOTA, May 11, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A father's motion to modify custody based on a move was properly denied without an evidentiary hearing because he did not establish a prima facie case under N.D. Cent. Code § 14-09-06.6 since permission to relocate to another state was granted in a prior unappealed order.
|
|||||
| Miller v. C.S. (In the Interest of C.S.), No. 20060116,
SUPREME COURT OF NORTH DAKOTA, May 11, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because the record did not show that appellant knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived his right to counsel, an order committing him to treatment in the state hospital for one year and allowing the State to involuntarily medicate him was reversed.
|
|||||
| Roth v. State, No. 20050227,
SUPREME COURT OF NORTH DAKOTA, May 11, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Denial of motion for postconviction relief was reversed and remanded because the petitioner should have had the opportunity to have the merits of his ineffective assistance of counsel claim considered, when the petitioner's claims of ineffective assistance of his trial and appellate counsel had never been addressed.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
