|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case
for free through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
Ohio - January 11, 2007
|
| |
|
| |
Janosek v. Janosek, Nos. 86771 and 86777,
COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, CUYAHOGA COUNTY, January 11, 2007, Released
View this case - free
|
Overview: Although a trial court properly awarded a wife attorney fees pursuant to R.C. § 3105.18(H) in the parties' dissolution action, based on the husband's dilatory tactics and financial misconduct, despite that she had the financial ability to pay, the award was error where it did not only award the portion of the fees attributable to his misconduct.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Lambert v. MetroHealth Med. Ctr., No. 87861,
COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, CUYAHOGA COUNTY, January 11, 2007, Released
View this case - free
|
Overview: Exclusion of a patient's expert was proper in his medical malpractice action, although the expert was generally qualified to testify about cardiology matters, as pursuant to Evid. R. 702(C), his opinion was not reliable where it was based on speculation and conjecture with regard to the acceptable standard of care and the causation of the injury.
|
|
| |
Nexstep Healthcare, LLC v. Patrician Skilled Nursing Ctr., Nos. 87850 & 87851,
COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, CUYAHOGA COUNTY, January 11, 2007, Released
View this case - free
|
Overview: A trial court's order finding an unsigned cognovit promissory note was a debtor's valid and binding commitment abused discretion because the debtor did not sign the note, as R.C. § 2323.13(D) required, so it was reversible error to enter judgment on the cognovit note. The debtor's oral settlement agreement in the court's presence was enforceable.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Rolfe v. Giusto, No. 87831,
COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, CUYAHOGA COUNTY, January 11, 2007, Released
View this case - free
|
Overview: A guardian ad litem (GAL) for a child who was the subject of a custody dispute was entitled to absolute immunity in the performance of his duties, and accordingly, a trial court properly granted summary judgment to the GAL in an action by a dissatisfied mother, as he had acted in the child's best interest and within the scope of his duties.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|