LexisNexis
  

Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - Ohio - January 26, 2007

  
City of Cincinnati v. Clif Cor Co., APPEAL NO. C-050831, COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, HAMILTON COUNTY, January 26, 2007, Date of Judgment Entry on Appeal
View this case - free  

Overview: Cincinnati, Ohio, Mun. Code 725-1-B was deemed unconstitutionally vague with respect to the factors that indicated that an area was blighted or deteriorated; accordingly, a city had no right to appropriate an owner's properties for purposes of an urban-renewal plan to eliminate the blight.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Coleman v. Wolfe, CASE NO. 06 NO 334, COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, SEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, NOBLE COUNTY, January 26, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: An inmate's petition for a writ of habeas corpus under R.C. § 2725.05 was dismissed because the speedy trial issues raised by the inmate in his petition had to be reviewed on direct appeal, not habeas corpus. Moreover, the inmate's guilty plea waived his ability to challenge speedy trial errors on appeal as well as in habeas proceedings.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Davis v. Davis, Case No. 06-CA-17, COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, CLARK COUNTY, January 26, 2007, Rendered
View this case - free  

Overview: The trial court erred in calculating the amount of expenses awarded upon the father's contempt. The evidence did not show that the father violated the court order by failing to pay for internet access for his son. The separation agreement required payment only for all costs for tuition, room, board, and books.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
E. Natural Gas Co. v. A.P. O'Horo Co., Case No. 2005-T-0078, COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, TRUMBULL COUNTY, January 26, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Where an appealing contractor provided a statement of evidence to an appellate court, although proper filing was with the trial court pursuant to App. R. 9(C), the statement was stricken; without an adequate record, the appellate court had to affirm the trial court's judgment based on a presumption of regularity.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Jordan v. State, CASE NO. 2006-T-0103, COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, TRUMBULL COUNTY, January 26, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: The inmate was not entitled to habeas corpus relief because he had an alternative remedy of seeking a direct appeal from the sexual predator classification. Further, because the inmate had been released from prison prior to filing his petition, his habeas corpus action was moot.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Lambda Research v. Jacobs, APPEAL NOS. C-050464, C-050502, COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, HAMILTON COUNTY, January 26, 2007, Date of Judgment Entry on Appeal
View this case - free  

Overview: A trial court abused its discretion under Civ. R. 26(C) and 45(C) in denying a former customer's motion to quash subpoenas and for a protective order against a former supplier regarding confidential information, as there was no consideration of the supplier's need for the discovery and safeguards to protect the information were not implemented.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Magnum Towing & Recovery, LLC v. City of Toledo Towing Bd. of Review, Court of Appeals No. L-06-1087, COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, LUCAS COUNTY, January 26, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: The decision of the Toledo Towing Board of Review to suspend the licensee from the towing list for 45 days, affirmed by the trial court, was clearly supported by competent, credible evidence. Items had been stolen from a recovered vehicle, in violation of Toledo, Ohio, Municipal Code § 765.17.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Manley v. Personacare of Ohio, CASE NO. 2005-L-174, COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, LAKE COUNTY, January 26, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: A trial court's grant of a nursing home's motion for a stay pending arbitration, pursuant to R.C. § 2711.02, was proper in a negligence action by a deceased resident's personal representative, as the agreement was procedurally unconscionable but not substantively unconscionable, and it was based on sufficient consideration.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Parkhurst Mall Corp. v. Taneyhill, CASE NO. 2006-T-0082, COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, TRUMBULL COUNTY, January 26, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: A trial court erred in holding a corporate plaza owner's attorney personally liable for the owner's liability to a city under a settlement agreement that the owner breached, as the trial court did not find that the attorney was a shareholder, officer, or director of the owner and accordingly, piercing the corporate veil was inappropriate.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
State ex rel. Duffy v. Pittman, CASE NO. 2006-P-0043, COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, PORTAGE COUNTY, January 26, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: An inmate was not entitled to a writ of mandamus directing a trial judge to vacate her decision denying the inmate's Civ. R. 60(B) motion for relief from a judgment ruling his probation violation sentence was to be served consecutively to his sentence for an underlying crime because he had an adequate legal remedy by appealing from that judgment.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

  www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us
  CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.