|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case
for free through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
Ohio - January 26, 2007
|
| |
City of Cincinnati v. Clif Cor Co., APPEAL NO. C-050831,
COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, HAMILTON COUNTY, January 26, 2007, Date of Judgment Entry on Appeal
View this case - free
|
Overview: Cincinnati, Ohio, Mun. Code 725-1-B was deemed unconstitutionally vague with respect to the factors that indicated that an area was blighted or deteriorated; accordingly, a city had no right to appropriate an owner's properties for purposes of an urban-renewal plan to eliminate the blight.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Davis v. Davis, Case No. 06-CA-17,
COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, CLARK COUNTY, January 26, 2007, Rendered
View this case - free
|
Overview: The trial court erred in calculating the amount of expenses awarded upon the father's contempt. The evidence did not show that the father violated the court order by failing to pay for internet access for his son. The separation agreement required payment only for all costs for tuition, room, board, and books.
|
|
| |
E. Natural Gas Co. v. A.P. O'Horo Co., Case No. 2005-T-0078,
COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, TRUMBULL COUNTY, January 26, 2007, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: Where an appealing contractor provided a statement of evidence to an appellate court, although proper filing was with the trial court pursuant to App. R. 9(C), the statement was stricken; without an adequate record, the appellate court had to affirm the trial court's judgment based on a presumption of regularity.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Magnum Towing & Recovery, LLC v. City of Toledo Towing Bd. of Review, Court of Appeals No. L-06-1087,
COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, LUCAS COUNTY, January 26, 2007, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: The decision of the Toledo Towing Board of Review to suspend the licensee from the towing list for 45 days, affirmed by the trial court, was clearly supported by competent, credible evidence. Items had been stolen from a recovered vehicle, in violation of Toledo, Ohio, Municipal Code § 765.17.
|
|
| |
Manley v. Personacare of Ohio, CASE NO. 2005-L-174,
COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, LAKE COUNTY, January 26, 2007, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: A trial court's grant of a nursing home's motion for a stay pending arbitration, pursuant to R.C. § 2711.02, was proper in a negligence action by a deceased resident's personal representative, as the agreement was procedurally unconscionable but not substantively unconscionable, and it was based on sufficient consideration.
|
|
| |
Parkhurst Mall Corp. v. Taneyhill, CASE NO. 2006-T-0082,
COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, TRUMBULL COUNTY, January 26, 2007, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: A trial court erred in holding a corporate plaza owner's attorney personally liable for the owner's liability to a city under a settlement agreement that the owner breached, as the trial court did not find that the attorney was a shareholder, officer, or director of the owner and accordingly, piercing the corporate veil was inappropriate.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|