LexisNexis
  
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - Ohio - February 4, 2003

  
Spurlock v. Douglas, Case No. 02CA19, COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, LAWRENCE COUNTY, February 4, 2003, Date Journalized
View this case - free  

Overview: In a trespass action where neighbors cut timber believing that they were harvesting trees on their own property, the trial court properly denied treble damages absent a showing of recklessness since the neighbors relied on a property survey.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
State Auto Mut. Ins. Co. v. Bd. of Trs. Foe Aerie 2232, Case Nos. 01CA728 and 01CA729, COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, ADAMS COUNTY, February 4, 2003, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: There was ample competent and credible evidence supporting the trial court's granting of declaratory judgment to the insurer excusing it from indemnifying defendant union, as the insurer had notice of a claim, but no notice of a lawsuit.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
State v. Brunett, Case No. 01CA2642, COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, ROSS COUNTY, February 4, 2003, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Necessary findings were made to support imposition of consecutive sentences, where defendant was convicted of aggravated vehicular assault. In imposing sentences, trial court discussed defendant's lengthy criminal record and victims' severe injuries.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
State v. Chavis, Nos. 01AP-1456, 01AP-1466, COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, FRANKLIN COUNTY, February 4, 2003, Rendered
View this case - free  

Overview: Although the testimony relating to gang membership was not relevant as there was other evidence showing the close bond between defendant and his friends, the admission of the testimony did not adversely affect defendant's right to a fair trial.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
State v. Grimsley, No. 02AP-502, COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, FRANKLIN COUNTY, February 4, 2003, Rendered
View this case - free  

Overview: By witnessing the commission of a specific traffic offense, a trooper had probable cause to stop defendant even if defendant's swerving over the right edge line was the consequence of a flat tire.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
State v. Hellman, Case No. 01CA726, COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, ADAMS COUNTY, February 4, 2003, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Defendant's designation as a sexual predator was supported by the evidence. He had sexual intercourse on multiple occasions with his mentally retarded stepdaughter by threatening to expel her from the only home she had ever known.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
State v. Kinstle, Case No. 02 COA 36, COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, ASHLAND COUNTY, February 4, 2003, Date of Judgment Entry
View this case - free  

Overview: Trial court properly denied suppression motion, where the totality of the circumstances proved that a consent to search defendant's residence granted by his fiancee was voluntarily given, and not a result of a hot pursuit.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
State v. Lewis, Case No. 02CA734, COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, ADAMS COUNTY, February 4, 2003, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: As the State failed to provide a transcript of the suppression hearing, the appellate court had to presume that the matters were considered and correctly resolved by the trial court when it granted defendant's motion to suppress the evidence.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
State v. Umphries, Case No. 02CA2662, COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, ROSS COUNTY, February 4, 2003, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: The motion for acquittal was properly denied as the State presented sufficient evidence that defendant robbed the convenience store with a deadly weapon, described as a knife or a screwdriver, for the aggravated robbery conviction.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Vega v. Vega, Case No. 2002AP060048, COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, TUSCARAWAS COUNTY, February 4, 2003, Date of Judgment Entry
View this case - free  

Overview: Relief from judgment was properly denied where, although wife was mistaken concerning value of certain assets, nothing prevented her from seeking information regarding the assets, and nothing suggested that husband actively concealed information.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

 www.lexisnexis.com  |  About LexisNexis  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Customer Support  |  Contact Us
  Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.