|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case
for free through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
Ohio - February 7, 2007
|
| |
Porter v. City of Green, C. A. No. 23379,
COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, NINTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, SUMMIT COUNTY, February 7, 2007, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: When a homeowner sought a variance from Green, Ohio, Codified Ordinance § 1296.02(h)(1)(B), limiting fence heights to six feet, because she wanted to have a six foot fence on top of a three foot landscaping mound, she did not have to obtain a variance because the ordinance unambiguously did not include the mound, when measuring the fence's height.
|
|
| |
Preferred Capital, Inc. v. Power Eng'g Group, Inc., No. 2005-2134,
SUPREME COURT OF OHIO, February 7, 2007, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: A floating forum-selection clause was not enforceable against lessees because, when the lease was signed, the lessor did not disclose that it intended to almost immediately assign its interest to a company in a foreign jurisdiction, and there was no showing that the lessees knowingly waived personal jurisdiction and agreed to litigate in any forum.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
State v. Brooks, C. A. No. 23236,
COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, NINTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, SUMMIT COUNTY, February 7, 2007, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: A statement that something just landed on a roof was an admissible excited utterance, under Evid. R. 803(2). Circumstantial evidence that defendant threw something, and that a gun was found in the area towards which he threw it, as well as his admissions, showed his weapon possession convictions were not against the manifest weight of the evidence.
|
|
| |
|
| |
State v. Geary, CASE NO. 06-CO-8,
COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, SEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, COLUMBIANA COUNTY, February 7, 2007, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: Competent, credible evidence supported defendant's classification as a sexual predator, pursuant to the factors in R.C. § 2950.09(B)(3), which included his relationship with the victim (he was her stepfather), the victim's age (between four and six), and the fact that he abused her five to 10 times, which showed a pattern of abuse.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|