 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Wilborn v. Bank One Corp., CASE NO. 04-MA-182,
COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, SEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, MAHONING COUNTY, February 12, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The common law did not bar mortgagees from requiring the payment of attorney fees to reinstate a defaulted mortgage because (1) the provision was not in the mortgagees' sole interest, (2) it was a condition of reinstatement, rather than an obligation arising in connection with the enforcement of a loan, and (3) no statutory provisions precluded it.
|
|||||
| Wohl v. Swinney, CASE NO. CA2006-05-123,
COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, BUTLER COUNTY, February 12, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: As a vehicle owner's insurance policy was ambiguous with respect to the provision indicating who was an "insured" for purposes of underinsured motorist coverage (UIM), the policy was construed in favor of the vehicle owner as the policyholder, thereby allowing the permissive driver to obtain UIM coverage.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| Copyright© 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
